What else can you suggest?
At a quick glance, which of these URLs represents the seat of the US executive?
Unlike in print, on the Internet it is not hard to create information that appears to be genuine and reliable.
For example:
How relevant or useful is the information for the purpose for which we are seeking it?
Does the site give a date of update? Can you test the information against other sources, look up events that you know occurred recently?
It pays to cross check several sources.
What is the height of Aoraki/Mt Cook? Compare:
It is also worth looking at whether the site helps you to verify the information. Does the source offer independent verification, such as links or citations?
Is it to provide information, advocacate a point of view, advertise a product? Is there a bias? Is the bias stated?
Compare these two pages:
What is the real purpose of this site?
It can be useful to see who makes links to the site. Several search engines allow you to do this. For example, Google has the link: command.
Try to see who links to http://martinlutherking.org by searching Google with the search
link:www.martinlutherking.org
Compare this with the types of links made to:
Expertise? Real organisation (physical location, range of contact details)? domain name/URL?
It is especially important to critically evaluate a page that you have found directly through search engine, without going through the home page of the site. It's important to establish the context of the page. Sources of information:
Who owns the domain for http://www.martinlutherking.org/ ?
| Introduction | Preparation | Tools | Directories | Search Engines | Strategies | Evaluation |
Last updated 19 June 2009 by Alastair Smith